SPRING deliverables

These are the public deliverables drafted under SPRING and submitted to the European Commission as required by the SPRING Grant Agreement.

WORK PACKAGE 2

D2.1 Classification system

This document summarises the approach taken to establish a systematic classification system for the SPRING project and presents the first consolidated version of this classification system1. The document uses the term “SPRING taxonomy” interchangeably with “systematic classification system for the SPRING project”.

Responsible: DUK
Contributors: DUK, EUR

WORK PACKAGE 5

D5.3 Templates for SPRING communication 

This deliverable presents the SPRING key visuals and project logo representing the project’s intentions, vision, and identity that will ensure project recognition to the addressed targets and the wider audience. It also outlines the creative and consultation process that led to the conception and validation of the communication tools. 

Responsible: YM
Contributors: ISMU

WORK PACKAGE 1

D1.1 Stakeholder Mapping Report

This deliverable provides an overview of existing CoPs as well as new actors in the integration arena. The mapping will be updated throughout the project.

Responsible: ICMPD, ICMC-Europe
Contributors: DUK

WORK PACKAGE 5

D5.7 Social Media Coverage

A document focusing on the communication aspects of SPRING with the objective to engage in and respond to the wider public debate online through sharing knowledge and evidence provided under the project.

Responsible: ISMU
Contributors: ISMU

WORK PACKAGE 5

D5.1 SPRING Platform

This document summarises the strategy and actions taken to establish the first footprint of the SPRING project online-platform. The platform represents the communication and engagement hub for the entire SPRING project.

Responsible: YM
Contributors: YM, ISMU

WORK PACKAGE 3

D3.2 Validation Grid

This deliverable contains a validation grid with a set of criteria for sustainable and successful practices. The aim of this grid is to provide an evaluation tool to examine different aspects of migrant integration practices and assess their quality.

Responsible: MPG
Contributors: MPG

WORK PACKAGE 5

D4.1  Diagnostic framework

This document presents three sub-approaches to Theory-Based Evaluation (TBE). More specifically, the framework is focused on impact evaluation, which means it is a theory-based impact evaluation framework.

Responsible: ISMU
Contributors: ISMU

WORK PACKAGE 4

D3.5  Policy Transfer Analysis

How can good integration practices be transferred or upscaled? In this Good Practice Transfer Analysis we explore if, how, and where good practices are transferred within Europe. 

Responsible: MPG
Contributors: MPG

WORK PACKAGE 5

D5.2  SPRING Platform @M18

This document summarises the steps undertaken to develop SPRING project online-platform. The platform represents the communication and engagement hub for the entire SPRING project.

Responsible: YM
Contributors: YM, ISMU

WORK PACKAGE 1

D1.5  Shared problem definition

This report addresses the findings of phase 1 of the Co-Design (CD) sessions in the “Barriers to integration” series. The CD trajectory is built in such way that the efforts go from diverging to converging, first brainstorming factors that constrict integration efforts (problems) and secondly creating a shared problem statement through discussion with various practitioners.

Responsible: EUR
Contributors: EUR

WORK PACKAGE 2

D2.3  SPRING Evidence Repository

The SPRING Evidence Repository is a section of the SPRING Platform (D5.1). It provides practitioners with easy access to a practical summary of research on integration policy practices.

Responsible: EUR
Contributors: EUR, DUK

WORK PACKAGE 4

D4.3  Promoting an evidence-based culture in integration policy

This document summarises the steps undertaken to develop SPRING project online-platform. The platform represents the communication and engagement hub for the entire SPRING project.

Responsible: MPI Europe
Contributors: MPI Europe

WORK PACKAGE 4

D4.4  Evaluation Policy Brief @M16

With more than 6 million people displaced from war-torn Ukraine in the first 2.5 months since the onset of the conflict and more expected to follow, a growing migrant integration challenge lies around the corner.

Responsible: MPI-E
Contributors: MPI-E

WORK PACKAGE 2

D2.2  A Review of Research on Integration Policy Practices in
the EU @M12

This report takes stock of research in the field of integration and more specifically, of research evidence on integration policy practices.

Responsible: DUK
Contributors: ICMPD, EUR, DUK

WORK PACKAGE 2

D2.5 Handbook on Integration Policy Practices for Newly Arrived Migrants @M18

This deliverable report presents the fifth deliverable of the WP2. We aimed to produce a report that presents the infographics and shares the generalizable findings from the reviews.

Responsible: EUR
Contributors: EUR, DUK

WORK PACKAGE 4

D3.1 - Gathered Practices Database @M23

We gathered collections of EU-wide integration practices that are deemed ‘good’ practices by integration practitioners, stakeholders, and policymakers, creating a pool of good practice collections to be disseminated via the SPRING online platform.

Responsible: MPG
Contributors: MPG

WORK PACKAGE 2

D3.4 - Validated Practices Database @M23

One of the main objectives of the SPRING project was to identify successful and sustainable practices of integration of newly arrived migrants.

Responsible: MPG
Contributors: MPG

WORK PACKAGE 2

D3.6 - Practitioner Toolkit @M22

This toolkit wants to help overcoming the obstacles for successfully adapting a good practice. Its primary target audience are practitioners who are interested in following a good practice found elsewhere.

Responsible: MPG
Contributors: MPG

WORK PACKAGE 4

D5.6 Videos on policy highlights @M22

The goal of this deliverable was to create four high-quality videos (D5.6) of up to ten minutes each that would present SprINg’s key findings, including not only a holistic overview of the project but also into specifics such as insights into the factors that help to upscale and transfer sustainable practices.

Responsible: MPG
Contributors: MPG

WORK PACKAGE 2

D1.6 - Shared and agreed upon solution to knowledge mismatch @M23

This report addresses the Co-design trajectory (CD-trajectory) findings, as part of Work package 1 of the Horizon 2020 project Sustainable PRactices of INteGration (SPRING) project.

Responsible: EUR
Contributors: EUR

WORK PACKAGE 2

D4.5 - Evaluation Toolkit @M21

This toolkit aims to help policymakers, program administrators and other integration actors more fully leverage evidence in their work.

Responsible: MPI Europe
Contributors: MPI Europe

SPRING Consortium:

ismu_logo
icmpd_logo
krems_logo
erasmus_logo
mpg_logo
MPI-Europe_LogoHighRes-LargeImage
icmc_logo
solidar_logo
youngminds_logo
ottawa_logo

In collaboration with:

eurocities_logo
spring_prezentare_v6

Subscribe to our newsletter:

Get in touch with us:

eu-emblem-rules_en-6_small

The contents of the website are the sole responsibility of the SPRING consortium and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union. The European Commission and the European Research Executive Agency (REA) are not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains.

 © SPRING. All rights reserved.

Back to top Arrow